Some parents think it is good to have mobile phones for their children, others disagree with it. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In the growing era of technology, there are few parents who believe that it is advantageous for the children to make use of mobile phones, tabs, etc. However, on the other hand, some parents have a view that technology is not doing any good in the growth of their children. This essay will discuss both sides of the view point.
Some parents think that there are numerous benefits of technology for their young children. Firstly, they feel that they stay connected with their kids wherever they got. Secondly, they think that with new application getting developed day by day, children can make use of them in their studies like completing projects. It helps to enhance their knowledge and remain updated with current affairs.
At contrary, there are few parents who feels that more use of mobile phones has created a social anxiety vaccum in the life of kids . According to them, when children get exposed to technology they forget about the people surrounding them. They do not tend to interact with their near and dear ones. Instead if chatting and attending local community festivals they tend to stick to their phones and talk to people who they have never met and unlikely to meet. This hampers their mental and social growth.
To conclude, I would say that there are both pros and cons of everything. Mobile phones have definitely proved to be a boom. However excessive use of technology has become hindrance in growth of youngsters. In my opinion children should be allowed limited use of phones so that they can upgrade their skills as well as also they stay connected with the people in their neighbourhood and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | Aroraprerna | 81 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | spkute | 58 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. 89
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who can go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:Explain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of you 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 61
- With a growing word population one of the most pressing issue is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- As computers translate quickly and acurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stly, they feel that they stay connected with their kids wherever they got. Secon...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ocial anxiety vaccum in the life of kids . According to them, when children get ex...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...interact with their near and dear ones. Instead if chatting and attending local communi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43410870835 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8478412525 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330987313023 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107989539906 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746689984743 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210425810217 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067946941487 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.