The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Nowadays, finding a good indicator to choose a great nation has gotten important. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether a great success of rulers, artists or scientists is a good factor or the general welfare is a better choice. I do believe the general welfare is a better suggestion for the survey. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, people are the main part of every country and the welfare of them indicates the ability of the governments to manage the country's problems. To put on the other hand, the country with poor people and a bad situation can indicate the weak government which is ruling this country. Surely, the people of this country cannot improve their condition because of the wrong policy which has chosen for the zone. To easily perceive my words, consider Iran, a great country with the reach resources, but, poor people encounter economic problems. If they had had a powerful government, they would never encounter the difficulties.
Furthermore, everyone likes artists, rulers, and scientists are the part of people of the country, hence improving the country needs the general welfare. To be specific, if the children of the country cannot go to the schools because of the problems such as economic or wars, in the future, the country will never have experts in the special fields. It is crystal clear, the governments have a responsibility to prepare the condition that everyone has the same opportunity to reach the goals. To make my point of view clear, consider a country which has a lot of problems for 20 years after 20 years, the new generation does not have the appropriate time to find their talent.
Without any shadow of a doubt, the general welfare and also the great achievements of the experts both of them indicate the great nation. A lot of countries all over the world have the general welfare but never has a great place in history. It is true, the experts of the society makes our country and without the help of them, the country will depend on the other countries. Let's consider an example to drive this fact home, the USA, a great nation, has the general welfare for their people also they have the main role in improving the technology. As a result, this country is a great place for all people who want to have the general welfare and evolve their field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First, atmospheric 3
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- Older teenagers 16 19 should be allowed to work at paid part time jobs 70
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 54
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 634, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would never encounter the difficulties. Furthermore, everyone likes artists, rul...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...try will depend on the other countries. Lets consider an example to drive this fact ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77723970944 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59574328521 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464891041162 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9335025707 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.611111111 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178158875287 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06880562922 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740039526448 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121398326517 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777694066196 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.