The diagram below shows the number of landline ownership telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
Depicted the chart is the information about how many people (per 1000) owned landline telephone in nine different countries over a half decade, since 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the general trend was for the ownership of landline telephone in all countries relatively to decrease during the period. Meanwhile, the figure in Singapore was the highest throughout the time scale.
In 2000, there were the two highest figures for landline telephone owners in Singapore and Brunei, standing at just over 450 –the maximum recorded- and just under 250 severally. This was followed by Philiphines and Thailand, which had a similar level, with just under 100. Meanwhile, the number of people owning landline telephone in Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar was under 50.
After 2000, the level of people having landline telephone in Singapore, Philipines, Myanmar, and Lao PDR experienced a slight decrease, dropping to around 450,50, and 0 consecutively at the end of period. Only after the figure in Brunei increased to 250 (2002), the level then to drop to around 230 (2004), while Thailand and Indonesia experienced an enormous fall to 0 by 2004. By contrast, there was a gradual decline in Cambodia and Vietnam, rising to 50 and just above 50 each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | sivasankar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | ps777777777777777 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jeheb | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three catagories, from 1995-2002 78
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 89
- The diagram shows proposed changes to Foster Road 58
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly after the figure in Brunei increased to 250 2002, the level then to drop to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16346153846 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69453462159 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1601731342 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225174870034 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914970942043 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974431494081 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153913487207 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840319122922 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.