Some people think all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Over the years, with the new types of jobs on the market, there has been an increase in option for university degrees. Nowadays, students have a variety to choose from. Some people claim that students should study whatever they are interested about, whereas other people argue that science and technology should be the only ones studied. The argument on both sides of the issue will be examined carefully in this essay.
On the one hand, there are people that believe that university students should study subjects that fuels their passion. To begin with, it is undeniable that people preform better at subjects they love and are face less stress in the future. For instance, employers love workers that are extremely engaging with their jobs. In addition, it also helps people find meaning in their life. Furthermore, it helps produce extremely talented and versatile graduates who would be easily employed or come out to become famous professionals.
On the other hand, some people believe that its beneficial to study science and technology only. Firstly, the current market trends in the 21st century indicates that there will be a high demand for STEM graduates. As a result, finding a job with science and technology degrees would be extremely easy. Secondly, since the graduates have a higher probability of employment than other majors, student debt can be played off faster.
In conclusion, from my point of view, I strongly support the fact that students should pursue what they love. It helps promote overall job satisfaction and happiness in the near future.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems. as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement> 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Technology had made recreational activities like listening music or watching films easier. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 78
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15891472868 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50924616711 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8758085814 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362189150884 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107928328225 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105529892715 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210512545854 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737572776597 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.