With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty. How can this be solved?
For the past few decades, there has been an overwhelming increase of the population as well as the destruction of a lot of natural sites owing mainly to the rapid expansion of urban zones. My following essay will discuss the long term benefits of preserving the world’s natural beauty and address some proactive measures to save the earth before it is too late.
At the outset, there is no denying that not only the human race but also the plants and animals can reap plethora of merits from the environmental conservation. Initially, these natural beautiful spots play an indispensable role in the development of people when they bring both health benefits and economic value. It is apparent that the beauty of nature has a special appeal that relaxes and refreshes like few other things can. In addition to its esthetic quality, exposure to nature can exert a positive impact on mental health, including diminishing stress, revealing anxiety and depression. Furthermore, with only a photo of a breathtaking view of an unpopular place, it is highly likely that there will be an upsurge in the popularity of this site, making it a place of interest which attracts a flux of visitors. As a result, it can bring a sustainable revenue growth to individuals and the country on the whole, which makes an enormous contribution to the enhancement of people’s living conditions.
Apart from that, protecting these stunning spots is a vital part of creating a balanced ecosystem. That the urbanization dominates all over the places makes it almost impossible for fauna and flora to survive and grow. Therefore, as soon as people take actions to minimize the enlargement of metropolitan areas at the expense of the nature, the balance of a diverse ecosystem will be maintained. This will definitely also help human being survive as they depend on the nature in food, drink etc on a massive scale.
Hence, immediate actions need to be taken as soon as possible by not only individuals but also the government. It is crucial for every citizen to be inculcated with the urgency, the vitality and their responsibility to prevent the damage that these beautiful places have to suffer. Furthermore, more strict laws should be brought in with the aim of restricting the rate of urbanization without the permission of the authority. This will induce a significant reduction in the growth of urban cities. Last but not least, as a way of dealing with the phenomenon, some birth controlling tools should be introduced. All people have to acknowledge of the birth controlling methods since a tax is set on every next child born, starting from the second. This will tackle the problem of overpopulation leading to the mushrooming development of cities.
To recapitulate, I whole heartedly believe that these appealing natural sites are one of the most pivotal part of our life and human need to change themselves to conserve them.
- Many people say that online games should be banned Do you agree with this idea 84
- some people say when a person travels into a new culture they should adapt to the local practices and customs. what extent do you agree or disagree? -- DISAGREE 84
- Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children. What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 84
- Does nature or nurture form a person 's personality? 78
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. To what extent do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... change themselves to conserve them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 1615.20841683 152% => OK
No of words: 486.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04320987654 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94007290523 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547325102881 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2110913218 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.55 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266823590099 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693600722006 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380414333376 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127248149594 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446724977625 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.