According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The article might seem logical at first, but when you read it again and again, you will findout that article content is flawed. Author has failed to give proper reasoning to few points mention in the prompt, So author needs to provide proper evidence in order to support the above prompt. There are few fallacys i would like to address below.
Author states that recent report from marketing department shows that fewer people are attending the movies, yet the percentage of postive reviews has increased but i sounds vague because there can be a lot different reasons that people are not attending their movies, maybe since past few years people got annyoned by watching same kind of movies which are produced by super screen, that why they don't want to go now, even though reviews are good that don't mean people will go to the movies, Author need to example provide what kind of specifice movie he is talking about, was these specific movies where able to pull people in past years, maybe it can also happen that this kind of specific movie are not common among generic movie groves. So author need to explain these point so that it makes the conclusion of the augment stronger, because if he does not explain these points then even when super screen increase their advertising budget, there won't be any increase in viewership.
Author also need to provide exaplation about the reviewers, what type of reviewes are these? for example, maybe be these reviewers are small time reviewers and they don't have enough reach to viewership base, that why people are not able to learn about the movies.
In conclusion, Author need to clarify these few flaws and provide the evidence so that it can be justified to increase the advertising budget and strenght the author's memo. Unless author clarify these point article will remain vague and flawed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Cynic | 43 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | nimesh94 | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | mcmaster | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | a251ravind | 63 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 23
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 320 350
No. of Characters: 1501 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.691 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.16 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.066 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.402 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.673 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.134 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...hor has failed to give proper reasoning to few points mention in the prompt, So au...
^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...he above prompt. There are few fallacys i would like to address below. Autho...
^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'i' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'sound'
Suggestion: sound
... of postive reviews has increased but i sounds vague because there can be a lot differ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...produced by super screen, that why they dont want to go now, even though reviews are...
^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... now, even though reviews are good that dont mean people will go to the movies, Auth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oint so that it makes the conclusion of the augment stronger, because if he does not explai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ewers, what type of reviewes are these? for example, maybe be these reviewers are s...
^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ewers are small time reviewers and they dont have enough reach to viewership base, t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...the advertising budget and strenght the authors memo. Unless author clarify these point...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 316.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19561878938 2.78398813304 79% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.8473053892 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 198.035786765 57.8364921388 342% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.111111111 119.503703932 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1111111111 23.324526521 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.70786347227 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238433069821 0.218282227539 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679471822528 0.0743258471296 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114860057337 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114541798582 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139849128301 0.0628817314937 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.3799401198 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.3550499002 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.1389221557 144% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.