A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education is one of the indivisible part and important part of human life. In education human learn about it's culture, and learn how to survive in society. Author states that nation should require all its students study same national curriculum until they enter college. I disagree with the author statement, there are many disadvantages for society if we look into deep.
First begin with, competition will get same among every student in nation and it will show adverse effect on student'sperformance. If curriculum is same and every student has to learn same things that other are studying. But every student is different and their skills are also different so, some students may have intelligence in specific field and that specific field is not in curriculum then student would not get excellence in that area. Lets take an example, maths is not in curriculum then what adverse effect would be done on student or nation or society. So studying same curriculum in school is not good idea to make nation or society develope.
If same curriculum in all schools of nation then there would be dispute between government and regional people. It may happen that specific regional history is different and that region want student to study them and get influence from that history, because history tell about society in deep. For instance, Some region has some famous personality like king and its history would surely make student like that personality so regional government imparted this curriculum to syllabus. But this syllabus may not be liked by other region. So common curriculum would begin dispute among region or with government.
Furthermore, people would start to send their children to other countries, because of common curriculum and ultimately it will have adverse effect on nation in future. For example, people send their children to other countries for better studying, it mean good student who are excellent in specific areas like research and development, would go to different countries and make that country great or developed. This surely make adverse effect in future for this country.
To sum up, because of stated reasons, I disagree with author's recommendation of same curriculum for all student in country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- You have three minutes to read the following passage and take notes.In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantag 83
- Whistler's painting. 60
- Work 60
- Altruism 76
- Space 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... would not get excellence in that area. Lets take an example, maths is not in curric...
^^^^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y it will have adverse effect on nation in future. For example, people send their childre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
...other countries for better studying, it mean good student who are excellent in speci...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20661157025 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70079812239 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449035812672 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.813721918 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365100042246 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132695886388 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199468686309 0.0758088955206 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209228992168 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128207032845 0.0667264976115 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.