“Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society”. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Recently, euthanasia in modern society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what do you do to society accept euthanasia?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government must be liable to face with this challenge, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, euthanasia is bound up inextricably with mortality, which indicates it leads to both death and fatal. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between chronic disease and symptoms of ill as well as an exponential increase in sickness effect. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of stressful lifestyle is correlated positively with not only mental problems but also physical damage.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, euthanasia attribute to modern community, in that it would come down to unhealthy food, less exercise, and daily life. A salient example of such attribution is retirement age, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take elderly old persons for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ageism problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to elderly right, nursery home, and even hospital care. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government in proposing useful suggestion.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that individuals, government, and public community should be accountable to solve this issue. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sant bir singh | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | English time | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 84 | view |
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- ’In future illiterate will not be those who cannot read, but those who do not learn’ – By some writer. Discuss what do you understand by this statement and state your reason. 85
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 88
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the psychological standpoint, eutha...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems but also physical damage. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt in proposing useful suggestion. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69310344828 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14430009188 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0567408675 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199406054894 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494945827525 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926472588069 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119192833754 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129904448132 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.