Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People that aim to be a famous athlete with many achievements are doubt themselves how can be one. Individuals born with talents may the answer for that question. But others put a belief in hard- working and practicing that lead to success in sport. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
There are some reasons why they have faith in non-stop training and that can be the best way to success in sport. Because of hard training, individuals can improve their physicals and many technics that raise the chance to be a successful sportsperson. Furthermore, the more they train the higher their knowledge can be used to win a match with other enemies who stand in their way to be famous. For instance, Dang Van Lam, a goalkeeper in U23 football team, was born with no gift. But throughout countless of practice and training, he has become a professional player and played for National football team.
On the other hand, talented people are still the main subject of favorable when taking about a successful sports individual that have achieve many reward and medal. If gifted persons use that talent in a right field of sports, they will easily surpass many others in the same places as them. In addition, talents are giving to their owner limitless of path to success in a field they choose in. For example, when a talented basketball player can play good in either offence or defense, they would make great achievements in every position in the match.
To be concluded, there is an idiom “Diligence in place of intelligence “. Even thought talented people have a greater start than ordinary ones, I believe in continue development in normal people that have a big determination in their dream to be a successful person in sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | mohamadi654094 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | tungnguyen3112 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | tungnguyen3112 | 73 | view |
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends whereas now many suffer loneliness and health problems What are the causes of this and what are some solutions 59
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that prison sentences should not be used in dealing with criminals. Education and job training should be used instead. To what extent do you agree on disagree? 56
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers. Would the advantages of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'achieved'.
Suggestion: achieved
... successful sports individual that have achieve many reward and medal. If gifted person...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reward seems to be countable; consider using: 'many rewards'.
Suggestion: many rewards
...ful sports individual that have achieve many reward and medal. If gifted persons use that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69093556293 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3559257151 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224366875348 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746513660456 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062128000482 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1409975821 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396417568878 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.