Foreign languages should be compulsory in the primary school. How far do you agree with the above statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory languages and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of knowing foreign language is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that foreign students can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning second language in primary schools can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of being bilingual, as well as local languages are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered better communication. thus, the beneficial ramification of both slang and phrases and language skills apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, foreign language people might increase the consequence of linguistic obstacles. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional speaking rely to the reality that the demerit of the fluent speaker pertain to learning aptitude. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university, has asserted that the downside of the semantic rules is negatively correlated with frequently used words. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of travelling and business.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of compulsory foreign language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of second language prove the significance of vital role in modern communication, but also pinpoint the implications of improve the level of personal skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Akashdeepsingh | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Nobal hundal | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Akashdeepsingh | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- "More information available online so library's book are useless" or As e-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree. 85
- what role should governments play to combat climate change? 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- "More information available online so library's book are useless" or As e-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...y. From a social standpoint, learning second language in primary schools can provide...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... which discovered better communication. thus, the beneficial ramification of both sl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65185185185 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17419291882 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6642856535 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232723449009 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676989939734 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523413548472 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122334186421 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367515414714 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.