It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
It is convinced that people who are interested in reading have better imaginations and language skill than people who prefer tellies. While it is clear that there is an abundant amount of TV programmes which seem to be more excited than books, I totally agree with the topic’s point of view
From the perspective of human creativity, while it is clear that films have many visual objects, works of literature force us to use our own imagination. Consequently, although people spend excitedly their leisure time on broadcast program, books stimulate our creativity better than ready-made contents on the telly. For example, one of the famous works of literary fiction which is named “Two Thousand Miles Under The Sea” describes an adventure of the characters under the sea. The story continuously broadens audiences’ literary horizons through the awesome description of mysterious creatures under the ocean.
In terms of linguistic improvements, if we fall into the habit of reading, books will enrich our range of vocabulary and perfect the way we use them, this is really an incredible benefit which television programmes have no. When we enjoy a book, an enormous amount of words are used in many contexts, and therefore, reading actually increases the ability of reading over our own written works and even helps us practice meticulousness.
In conclusion, many people believe that reading habit boosts human imaginations and language skill than watching TV. I totally agree with this, and therefore, I think parents should encourage children’s literary appreciation, especially by bedtime stories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | quynhan1995 | 67 | view |
- The map describes the change of a park from 1980 to now 68
- The plan below shows a typical American and Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gree with the topic's point of view From the perspective of human creativity...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re used in many contexts, and therefore, reading actually increases the ability o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46640316206 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02008358705 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624505928854 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2873313139 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248778970194 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118029935283 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162681873857 0.0667982634062 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177447119621 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147750607926 0.056905535591 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.