The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
The given pie charts illustrate the comparison in 5 different types of energy production of France, over the course 10 years starting in 1995.
Looking at these pictures, it is clearly evident that an amount of coal, nuclear and gas energy witnessed an upward trend with the exception of an mount of petro fuel. The coal production registered the highest number in both 2 pie charts.
In term of coal production, there was a slight change from 29,8% to 30,93% between 1995 and 2005. A similar trend was witnessed in the amount of gas figure at 30,31% in 2005 which was higher than its production in 1995, accounted for 19,63%.
The most noticeable shift was the drop of petro energy, it stood at 29,27% in 1995 and then this figure declined dramatically to 19,55% in 2005. However, an amount of nuclear in 2005 was higher than around 4 percent , compared to 1995.
- writing task 1: the birth rates of China and America 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant. 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. ( pounds sterling) 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...nd gas energy witnessed an upward trend with the exception of an mount of petro fuel. The coal produc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d an upward trend with the exception of an mount of petro fuel. The coal productio...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in 2005 was higher than around 4 percent , compared to 1995.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48625595342 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9501788419 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236153434563 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116171179163 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078403190594 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153404764032 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842523636585 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.