It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that governments of countries around the world cannot afford enough educational facilities for an increasing number of individuals at young age and also, it is not necessary to provide universities for all young people. While countries are in need of well-educated young people, I agree with the idea that it is impossible and nearly useless to put up universities for the majority of students.
On the one hand, not all young people want to put themselves through universities. Some individuals like to take lower level classes of education because they do not meet the criteria of most universities. In Vietnam, there are high proportion of students who take part in part-time courses in order to get certificates for their job’s requirement. For example, for low quality job such as taxi drivers, construction workers, tailors, etc , companies still require some related certifications. In addition, there are other students who can find jobs after high school graduation so they do not need to go to universities for studying.
While the two mentioned ideas illustrate that it is unnecessary for countries to provide universities for students, the most important reason is that building up institutes for the rising number of young people is an impossible task for governments. Reports show that there were up to 50 percent of Vietnam population demanding university places in 2016. That substantial number of students is a big problem for the government.
On the other hand, it is no doubt that countries need to put up more institutes for young individual because they are the future workforce. The higher level they study their occupations, the better contribution from these people in the future.
In conclusion, while countries need to provide university places for students to educate high-skilled workers, I believe putting up high level educational facilities for all young people is neither possible nor useful for the governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Thao Phan Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that teachers have an important role to play in the educational success, while others think it is the attitude of students that matters. Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- : Some people believe that success in life depends on hard work and determination, while others believe that other factors like money and personal appearance are important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people believe that teachers have an important role to play in the educational success, while others think it is the attitude of students that matters. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vers, construction workers, tailors, etc , companies still require some related ce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33865814696 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07839080015 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5303514377 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6859927597 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402616629634 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139229105398 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109501620634 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244354497335 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109179414621 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.