Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.)
Recently, replacement of small shops by large shopping malls has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, shopping methods are bound up inextricably with business partners, which indicates they lead to both online shopping and shopping centers. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between currency exchange and large production as well as an exponential increase in substantial benefit. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of national trade is correlated positively with not only costumers but also affordability.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, shopping malls attribute to urbanization, in that it would come down to rural, city, and remote region. A salient example of such attribution is long distance, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take residential citizen for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint civilization problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to inexpensive goods, mass production, and even packaging. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of internet and globalization.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that expansion of large shopping malls is the high importance in modern cities. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2018-02-17 | vahid07 | 88 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 88
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 85
- Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree 85
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, shopping me...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... costumers but also affordability. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole of internet and globalization. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72887323944 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15114484695 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68661971831 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2717070789 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201111752593 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526808573473 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639551254511 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119088084725 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758492079345 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.