It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. Why is this happening? What would be the best solution to keep them open.
Nowadays, the admission fee to enter historical sites is steadily more costly than it was before. While various factors are responsible for this situation, but certain measures could be taken to alleviate it.
This phenomenon is the result of several causes. Firstly, historical buildings' conservation expenditure is much higher that makes the government, as well as the site's management, struggle to allocate the fund for it. As a result, the entry ticket price needs to be increased which leads to dramatically decrease in the number of local visitors. The fewer guests come to the site the more difficult the financial circumstance it will be. Secondly, in the modern world, especially the millennials, who are vulnerable to adverse influences are failing to see the value of monumental buildings. They don't find it's necessary to take their precious time to take a tour through those historical sites because the emerging of western culture has been getting all of their attention.
Various possible suggestions could be given in order to tackle the above.
In the first place, the governing body could launch a nationwide campaign to raise awareness about the importance of traditional identity. For instance, promoting a vibrant art scene with different festivals, events, carnival near the historical sites, museums could encourage people to come there to learn, to understand, to have tolerance and treasure their past. Furthermore, some financial tactics could be implemented to boost the number of local visitors like having a special entry pass for students, concession tickets for elders and combo pass for foreign tourists from overseas. The profit per customer could be decreased a bit but definitely, the total revenue will be improved to help management to maintain and optimize the efficiency of the operation.
In conclusion, some factors lead to the increment in the entry fee to the historical sites but this situation could be addressed by the launch of public campaigns and the implementation of a flexible ticket fee program. Given this situation, it is recommended that steps should be taken immediately to maintain the value of the cultural identity and help everyone in the public have more chances to access more historical sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | namnguyen08 | 84 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to preven illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 89
- It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. Why is this happening? What would be the best solution to keep them open. 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on protection of wild and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 11
- These days people in some countries are living in a "throw-away society" which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are it's causes? What could be done to address this issue? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
... of several causes. Firstly, historical buildings conservation expenditure is much higher...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sites'' or 'site's'?
Suggestion: sites'; site's
...at makes the government, as well as the sites management, struggle to allocate the fu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the value of monumental buildings. They dont find its necessary to take their precio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30919220056 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88676702491 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57938718663 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3981949164 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.066666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170347946745 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058419875946 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428176908085 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098696676392 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204830167179 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.