It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to preven illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend to you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some that government spending should be allocated to encourage an active and healthy lifestyle to get rid of sickness rather than treating people's illnesses. I completely agree with this opinion because prevention is always better than fixing problems.
The most compelling reason for holding my view is that the governing body could improve people's health from the root by allocating more funds to promote local organic products. These wholesome and nutritious foods are very rich in vitamins and minerals which brings many significant benefits to everyone's health even though they might be a bit pricey but still a worth expense.
Another reason for my position is that government expenses should be spent more on some programs to encourage people practicing healthy dietary habits. Any person ought to consider healthier options in every meal rather than personal choices to prevent excessive calorie intake as well as control the sense of immediate gratification. For example, vegetables should be consumed more every day more than red meat or junk foods should be taken out of all meals.
Lastly, the governing party could launch some nationwide campaigns to raise public awareness about the active lifestyle by promoting a vibrant sports scene near residential areas or public recreation areas. Everybody will have more chances to have access to different sports activities and workout to continuously stay in shape or get lean and eventually, to have good health. For example, the public gym spot could be built under each housing block and opened to everyone to use all the facilities.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the opinion that government expenditure should be spent more on promoting healthy life. The best solution to this is to raise people's awareness about an active lifestyle and healthy eating habits that naturally protect them from illnesses. Given this situation, it is recommended that the governing body should take action immediately to strengthen the public health index as well as cut the public expense on medication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | namnguyen08 | 89 | view |
- These days people in some countries are living in a "throw-away society" which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are it's causes? What could be done to address this issue? 84
- It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. Why is this happening? What would be the best solution to keep them open. 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on protection of wild and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 11
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to preven illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f immediate gratification. For example, vegetables should be consumed more every...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, still, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67426774818 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.4759355605 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.538461538 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16228660302 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609962623571 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399258102352 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955994901561 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407745542939 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.