Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
The statement is the current way of life of present generation will have negative impact on future generations to come. I completely agree with the statement because of the reasons I explore in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, present generations continuous exploitation of resources. The fossil fuels consumed by today's generation will definitely have negative impact on coming generations. The pollution of the environment, the global warming our caused due to continuous exploitation of resources is very high. For instance, I will use the air conditioner to the greatest setting in summer and make sure every room is warm in winter turning blind eye to lots and lots of green-house released. The present generation even aware of the potential risks it can pose to the future generation is indolent in taking up the preventive measures.
Secondly, i strongly believe that the garbage we produce today is higher than ever. The trash cans in the city are filled to the brim and government is planning for installing extra garbage bins in few places in my city. Scientific studies are not completely able to find a proper solution to this waste reduction, Until the proper and efficient measures for the garbage disposal and reuse are proposed, it would be better to control the wastage because there is a study depicting that the few kilometers of the pacific-ocean are filled with garbage because of which many marine animals died and became extinct. Unless the garbage produced is reduced from now on, there shall be appalling upshot in the food-chain effecting the total living organisms on the earth.
Third point is, present generation has become addicts to the gadgets that they are unable to do the simple tasks on their own. This addiction led to increase in crime rate, though it has many uses. But when an invention is made, all the outcomes should be kept in mind before making it available to the commoners. Everyone knows the devastating and terrifying invention of atom bomb. Though it's invention has many uses, it's availability in the wrong hands led to several devastating results. So, i conclude that an invention made should be made available with certain terms and conditions before making it public.
In sum, I conclude that the way of life of current generation indeed have negative impact on future generation. One should be an example to the future generation in an inspiring and in a good way and not serving as an example to be hated.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 65
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? 70
- The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books."Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago, Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader-friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on a 78
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than 35
- The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres Seven years ago homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community s yards should 81
Comments
There is a great debate…
There is a great debate considering rather our current way of life will have a negative or positive impact on future generations. I believe that the path that we are taking is going to have a negative impact on future generations. In this essay I will be addressing three potential problems with the way that we are currently living life.
First of all, we are making too much pollution for the future generations to deal with. For example, the current industries are producing too much carbon dioxide for our atmosphere, there is going to be a time where the earth won't be able to hold on. The carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere affects the amount of greenhouse gases, which are linked to global warming and climate change, at this rate there is going to be a time where we won't be able to survive the earth's warmth.
Secondly, there is going to be too much advancement in technology for the future generations. I believe that traditions are a very important aspect for all of us, I am afraid that with the evolution of technology people will begin to forget all the traditions of their culture. There is also the fact that people won't have to learn basic things since technology will have it covered. Of course, the advancement of technology is important, but when if gets in the way of our culture it can be worrying.
Last but not least, vehicles that we create to facilitate our day to day lives are causing too much pollution. Just like it was stated in paragraph two, the pollution that we make, affects the earth's climate, meaning in the future our planet will be too hot for humans to survive. Additionally, carbon dioxide is already affecting life in the ocean, animals are already beginning to go extinct, imagine what can happen in the future. As you can see, I believe that the way we are living life will affect future generations and we have to be careful if we want our grandchildren to live a happy life without fixing the problems that our generation made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...resources. The fossil fuels consumed by todays generation will definitely have negativ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...led to several devastating results. So, i conclude that an invention made should ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00483091787 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75952097443 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541062801932 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3478587041 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231241058419 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716177908457 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117103886407 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162428805187 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16346730917 0.0645574589148 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.