People have different views about the benefits of the ‘vertical’ city as opposed to a ‘horizontal’ city, while there are some clear advantages of the latter one, I believe that multistory buildings are usually more practical and realistic.
A ‘vertical’ city has two clear advantages. To begin with, it occupies less land, which means more land could be used by the government to build schools, hospitals, and parks, which directly facilitate citizens’ daily life. Secondly, it would be an optimal approach to housing issues for big cities especially those which are experiencing population surge. Multistory buildings can be designed up to 826 meters high and have more than a hundred floors, then they are able to accommodate thousands of people. In this way, these skyscrapers effectively meet the demand for accommodation of the ever-growing population and mitigate the pressure caused by the land shortage.
On the other hand, many people prefer a ‘horizontal’ city because it often gives them a broader field of vision, and allows them to get close to nature. When they stand on the rooftop, with fewer high-rise buildings hinder the view, they can see the sun rising from the horizon and the forest in the distance. By contrast, what people can experience from the ‘vertical’ city is enormous stress caused by the crowded office blocks. Another benefit of the city consisted of low-rise construction is that people can escape quickly from buildings when some emergencies occur. For example, it takes them a shorter time to run out of the building than those living in the upper-floor if an earthquake happens.
In conclusion, compared to the vertical city, the horizontal city requires more land, which is not realistic in most countries; We should consider more about the practicality of residential and official architectures since earthquake happens in a low frequency. All in all, I believe the vertical city is better.
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 90
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 84
- Task 2: Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes of this problem? Suggest solutions 84
- Today, people in many countries choose to work and live wherever they like thanks to communication and transportation technologies. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Television has changed the quality of life for an ordinary person. Do you agree or disagree ??? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...'vertical' city as opposed to a 'horizontal' city, while ther...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...sually more practical and realistic. A 'vertical' city has two clear...
^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... On the other hand, many people prefer a 'horizontal' city because it ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 965.302439024 174% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37380191693 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42690741543 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 106.607317073 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 283.868780488 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6433185176 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186851202256 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706746048273 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466915495934 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119297331014 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394665181948 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 40.7170731707 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.