Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, teachers are the people who can change the future of society. They have a direct effect on the next generations, which will make the future. So great is the role of the teachers in every society that draws attention to them consistently; their importance could not be underestimated. In this regard, some controversies always arise whether the teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are now. Although many could be against this idea, personally, I agree with it. In the following lines, I will present and investigate two reasons to substantiate my response.
The first reason is that they had a higher degree in the past. In other words, the knowledge and who deal with it have a greater position in society; knowledge always considered a special field among people, and few ones really attended to it. Moreover, people were occupied by ordinary careers such as agriculture or cattle raising and received necessary information about these activities from their family members. Therefore, teachers, as who had a special duty, were always valued and cherished by people. In comparison, now, people have higher education levels and occupy many critical jobs in society, and being a teacher is considered an ordinary career. For example, my mother’s aunt used to be a teacher. She always told us about the importance of teachers in the past and how people in the past respected and valued her.
The second noteworthy point is that teachers used to be considered sacred in the past. The educations usually stemmed from religious notions and rituals. Schools used to be the churches or mosques, and the major parts of the education were based on learning the holly books. Compared with now that teachers have little to do with the religion or religious beliefs of society. For instance, in my country, Iran, where most people are Muslim, Schools used to teach the context of the Quran. Children took part in schools to got familiar with religious tenets or to be able to read the holy book. So, the teacher was valued by people constantly as who has an important role in the constitution of the children’s religious beliefs.
In summary, having analyzed the reasons above, I think that teachers had greater values in the past. Because not only have they supreme positions in society but also they were teaching the religious contexts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or anew country because you will lose old friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 44
- tpo 41 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, by and large, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71872097686 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5325 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2858969151 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243556540953 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072783303769 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657013348666 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163555031124 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519743501042 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.