The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Nowadays, environmental damage has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question" what are the positive and negative consequences?". it is a widely held view that endangered species are highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must carefully weigh up the pros and cons of protected species.
From a social point of view, air pollution is indeed bound to rare species, which means it might lead to both extinct species and water pollution. For example, a group of profound environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between marine pollution, industrial pollution as well as a powerful earthquake. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the connection that global warming is positively correlated with not only total extinction but also nature conversation and acid rain.
in geological terms, natural resources are undoubtedly attributable to eco-friendly protect, in that it would lead to a conservation area, a natural disaster, and environmental protection. A well-known example of such attribution is environmental degradation, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking the global tension for granted. Had it risen in temperature in advance, it might have had the opportunity to do the catastrophic floods. thus, a natural phenomenon could play a significant role in climate change.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that, the advantages of the water cycle outweigh its disadvantages. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | davood mohammadi | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | namdevjd1 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 11 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. What are the reasons for that? 79
- Study a Particular Area of Climate Change: 11
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 84
- Successful sports and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not. 80
- tourism 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...wadays, environmental damage has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...itive and negative consequences?'. it is a widely held view that endangered s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...so nature conversation and acid rain. in geological terms, natural resources are...
^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ortunity to do the catastrophic floods. thus, a natural phenomenon could play a sign...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64772727273 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48440173355 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7017665634 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0279551939043 0.242375264174 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00936490392901 0.0925447433944 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125405292386 0.071462118173 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0158080744705 0.151781067708 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0096588737161 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.