The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000.
<span style="font-size: 24.2px;">The bar chart compares four different cities, namely Los Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing and Mexico City, in terms of the daily minimum and maximum levels of SO2 and N2O which discharged into the environment in the year 2000.
Overall, Mexico City had the most amount of SO2 and N2O sending to the atmosphere.
In Los Angeles, the quantity of SO2 emitted to air was the lowest of all cities, with a minimum average of 2 micrograms per m3 and a maximum average five times as much, at 10 micrograms. The levels of N2O emissions were much higher with the maximum medium reaching over 100 micrograms per m3. Meanwhile, Mexico City had the worst air quality because the number of SO2 and N2O released daily was always very high at 80 and 113 with a minimum and 200 and 207 with a maximum.
In contrast to Los Angeles and Mexico City, the main reason to cause pollution in the other two cities was SO2. The everyday average maximum figures for SO2 emissions were 59 micrograms per m3 in Calcutta and 100 micrograms per m3 in Beijing. By contrast, the maximum figures for N2O were just over 50 micrograms per m3 in both cities.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | Baonhi | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | Baonhi | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture services industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 84
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 78
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries 2000 2012 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79310344828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98946194486 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522167487685 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4301282561 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2606217553 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108321381691 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565100660866 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140954026662 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07050124696 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.