Flying by aeroplane is becoming more popular throughout the years and will inevitably grow in the future. As a result, some argue that it should be limited due to the notion that it consumes the fuel supply of the world and causes severe air pollution. This essay will discuss why the writer completely disagrees to this notion.
To begin with, a certain minority thinks that the aviation industry should be given some restrictions because planes have bigger engines. Hence, they use a huge amount of fuel to travel longer miles across the globe and as a result, there is an increasing amount of carbon dioxide emission on the atmosphere which worsens air pollution. Moreover, as time pass by, there is an incredible rise of travellers that enables the airlines to add more flights to accommodate the demands of the people that is believed to be one of the main cause of global warming and further depletion of the supply of the fossil fuel reserve. However, the aviation industry is not the only cause of air pollution. Numerous studies show that travelling on land causes more air pollution. According to EEA, transporting the same number of passengers in a plane by bus emits more carbon dioxide because vehicles use more energy and another 10 % will be added due to the heavy traffic on the roads. Furthermore, because of the technological advancement, alternative fuels are already promulgated and aircraft engines are now enhanced and modified to lessen the use of fuel and reduce air pollution.
After positing the above arguments, the writer unequivocally disagrees that air travel should be reduced because of its tremendous benefits. First, it plays a vital role in building a countries economy by aiding the promotion of tourism. It creates more revenues for the government and provides job opportunities for people to thrive. Second, it gives experience to people and helps reached their dreams by allowing them to go to other places. Although it accounts to 10 % of carbon dioxide emission and huge fuel consumption, a lot of agencies such as the United Nations, EEA, and Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuel Initiative, are working together towards an eco-friendly air journey. Strict rules and guidelines are now being implemented to make sure that the carbon emission is less, if not totally zero. Also, developments and researches are continuously funded by governments worldwide to create alternative fuels for planes.
In conclusion, air travel should not be restricted because it is not the main cause of air pollution and renewable energy sources are now being used as a substitute for fuel.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resourches. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- people sleep less than before in many countries. why people sleep less? what effect does it have individually and in society? 73
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 11
- Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... completely disagrees to this notion. To begin with, a certain minority thinks...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... use of fuel and reduce air pollution. After positing the above arguments, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...st, it plays a vital role in building a countries economy by aiding the promotion of tour...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... create alternative fuels for planes. In conclusion, air travel should not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09324009324 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8254164521 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529137529138 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5268380182 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.388888889 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320427416708 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954403212144 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861825581684 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218476852752 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861937580111 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.