Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debate on whether the number of cars will decline in the future or will increase has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that the number of vehicles on the roads will decrease noticeably in the future. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I agree with the former. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that the prices of vehicles in the global markets are climbing remarkably. As a result, the demand for cars will cut. Moreover, the cost of fuel for cars keeps going up. For instance, many researchers in the crude oil market have confirmed that the prices of fuel will climb in the following years and the price of a single crude oil barrel is going to be more than 100 dollars.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is the environmental issue. Many environmental activists are calling to depend less on cars and use public transportation instead. Even though the usage of cars would save time much, the amount of pollutant emissions from these vehicles has reached millions of tonnes in many cities. A vivid example which can shed light on the subject is one from my research experience, in the last year, I had researched the air pollution issue. However, the research has revealed that about 70 percent of the total amount of carbon dioxide is from vehicles.
To warp it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, one can soon realize that the number of cars on the roads will decline in the future due to environmental issues and an increase in fuel cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called 81
- The Little Ice Age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900C.E.. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientists have long wondered what ca 60
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For students who are planning to work in business learning about psychology is more important than learning about technology Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- UBecause of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involv 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61707893522 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1744469999 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4375 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166260363525 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504714436959 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327950606071 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087588311114 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285349568439 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.