The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the percentage of 65-and-above years old people in three different countries namely America, Sweden, and Japan throughout a century, starting from 1940.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that all of the three countries witnessed the same upward trend over the same period of time.
More specifically, starting at 5%, the proportion of Japanese aging population decreased slightly and remained at roughly 3% in the first 40 years. Whereas the others experienced an upward trend and reached at 15% for America and 14% for Sweden in 1980. The figures for Japanese aging population soon rose again, followed by a predictable rapid increase of 24%. It is forecasted that 65-year-and-above population of Sweden will reach its peak at 20% which was 6% higher than that of USA in the 2010s. However, the aging population of USA and Sweden are predicted to witness a gradual rise of 9% and 5% respectively in 2040 compared to that of in 2012.
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
- Some people say that the most important thing for being rich is people have opportunity for helping other person ? Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Topic More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at the diagram highlights the fact that all of the three countries witnessed the same upwa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sed the same upward trend over the same period of time. More specifically, starting at 5%, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95906432749 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87691958954 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2326370194 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203458249499 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851202740349 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423135223317 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115577095473 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338613447896 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.