The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the percentage of 65-and-above years old people in three different countries namely America, Sweden, and Japan throughout a century, starting from 1940.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that all of the three countries witnessed the same upward trend over the same period of time.
More specifically, starting at 5%, the proportion of Japanese aging population decreased slightly and remained at roughly 3% in the first 40 years. Whereas the others experienced an upward trend and reached at 15% for America and 14% for Sweden in 1980. The figures for Japanese aging population soon rose again, followed by a predictable rapid increase of 24%. It is forecasted that 65-year-and-above population of Sweden will reach its peak at 20% which was 6% higher than that of USA in the 2010s. However, the aging population of USA and Sweden are predicted to witness a gradual rise of 9% and 5% respectively in 2040 compared to that of in 2012.
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reason What solution to solve them 95
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 11
- Nowadays many animal species are becoming extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must solve this problem others believe that humans beings are more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at the diagram highlights the fact that all of the three countries witnessed the same upwa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sed the same upward trend over the same period of time. More specifically, starting at 5%, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95906432749 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87691958954 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2326370194 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203458249499 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851202740349 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423135223317 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115577095473 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338613447896 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.