Some people think it is always an advantage to buy local products. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been observed that regional or national goods have changed views of consumers. Some individuals believe that consuming national goods could be more advantageous while others opine this by stating that international products could be more better. However, I staunchly agree with the opinion that buying products from regional market is more beneficial in terms of affordability, availability as well as variety.
There are numerous facts that support my opinion. First and foremost of all, not every consumer can afford highly priced items. Therefore, if an item is bought is supplied by a regional supplier than cost would be way too less in contrast with the imported items. Moreover, fresh stock is readily available in the market and consumers can purchase it any time from local supply stores. In addition, local manufacturers can take care of regional consumers needs along with the choices. Hence, local individuals can easily get products according to their demands.
Another pivotal aspect of local goods is that ingredients that are used in the products are manufactured with in the same environment as of consumers. Since, it gives chances to national suppliers to boost their income which in turn benefits the country’s economy. To put it plainly, this producer and consumer life cycle plays a vital role to increase national income therefore, a country can easily pave its path towards success.
To recapitulate the above aforementioned points, consuming regional goods could be more beneficial. Not only, they are more cheap and readily available in local market but they can also boost country financial stability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- You have organised 90th birthday party of your relative and invited elderly guests also It was a successful party Write a letter to the hotel manager to provide the feedback In your letter you should tell when the party was why it was successful thank for
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of such services 60
- Some people think it is always an advantage to buy local products Do you agree or disagree 76
- Some people think it is always an advantage to buy local products Do you agree or disagree 84
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Are the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of such services 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ng that international products could be more better. However, I staunchly agree with the op...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the same environment as of consumers. Since, it gives chances to national suppliers...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33590733591 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79248021785 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9030014094 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114099653169 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380718531772 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402106442983 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655406057434 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361668826781 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.