Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or the military. Others think women are less suitable for this kind of job. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether female applicants for police or the military job should be treated equally regardless of the gender difference or these kinds of job do not fit for women. In this essay, I will examine this question from both points of view and then explain why I agree with the former opinion.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that women should be treated in a similar way to men in applying for police and the military. The main reason for believing this is that all individuals have a right to choose their job freely. It is the fundamental human rights, which should be provided for everyone equally. This principle can be applied for any kind of job, including law enforcement and the army. It is also possible to say that female workers is definitely necessary in any workplaces. There is a type of job that is more favorable for women to deal with. One good illustration of this is physical examinations for female criminals and injured female soldiers. If men do this, it may cause the issue of sexual harassment.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that women are unsuitable for these kinds of job. People often have this opinion because these jobs are physically challenging for women. Generally speaking, women are inferior to men in terms of physical strength. Police officers and soldiers have many opportunities to fight with brutal male criminals and warier in a crime scene or a battle field. In these situations, it is highly possible that female officers or soldiers become a victim of physical violence or even sexual assault.
In conclusion, I believe that both argument are convincing. On balance, however, I tend to believe that women should be treated equally in application for police and the military from the view point of human rights and role that women can play in some situations rather than being treated unequally in terms of physical strength.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-29 | pritambhanguz | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | pritambhanguz | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-16 | lostsonam | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | AkiraM | 69 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 70
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... who argue that women should be treated in a similar way to men in applying for police and the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81976744186 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62908365301 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505813953488 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7068506329 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510735730275 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153909208125 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110181655426 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32575598554 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596701550193 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.