problems with a painting of Rembrandt
The article states that there are problems with a painting of Rembrandt that suggest it could not be a work by him and provides three reasons pf support. However, the professor explains that by several examinations and analysis it is proved that the painting is original, and refutes each of the auther's reasons.
First, the reading claims that there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. The professor refutes this point by stating that a luxurious fur collar was added by someone about one hundred years after the painting was created, in order to increase the value of the painting.
Second, the article posits that light and shadow do not fit together in this painting, while Rembrandt would never have made such an error. However, the professor says that in the original painting the woman wore a light cloth that illiminate her face, and it is looked realistic, but by adding the fur collar, it seems that the light and shadow do not fit together.
Third, the letter averts that the painting was on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together, while Rembrandt often painted on a single wood panel. The lecture opposes this point by explaining that someone added some extra pieces of wood to the original panel to enlarge it and show it more grand and also, make it more worthy. In addition the examinations proved that the wood which is used in this panel is as same as other his work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Beichen | 88 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | sara.ana | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | Sara refaat | 68 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | Elhamsarvari | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g of Rembrandt that suggest it could not painted by him and provides three reason...
^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'paint'
Suggestion: paint
...of Rembrandt that suggest it could not painted by him and provides three reasons pf su...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...grand and also, make it more worthy. In addition the examinations proved that the wood w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, second, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78087649402 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36770732976 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0709178025 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254500539467 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101800447028 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145330125759 0.0662205650399 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156155371063 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143667469824 0.0443174109184 324% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.