Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory. To what extent do you agree?
A great man once said, “We should never judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree”. In the current education system, we all are learning like a herd of sheep while practically we born to be specialized in different things. We all come through different levels of society with different abilities to learn and different abilities to implement our knowledge.
We have a proverb in our language, “A son of a butcher becomes a butcher” Meaning is, if you see some profession very closely from the very childhood, you eventually become good in that. That’s the primal technique of learning. We always watch and learn from the era we were monkeys. This is how children should be taught. If they learn something else at school and something very different after coming home then, it will be difficult for them to choose the right career and we can see, the adolescents in India are facing this very same problem.
Children should be tough something they are familiar with. We all have dreams in our childhood. At that time we can become anyone from the scientist to the farmer but later on, this education system crushes our dreams and make everyone confuse by teaching us both farming and rocket science. We don’t need that. We want specific knowledge in a specific field for everyone.
In conclusion, I completely agree with the thought of making some subjects optional if they require some extra set of skills and going to be used by only some of the professions then why bother teaching a fish to climb a tree? Instead, we should see his or her interest. All fields are easy and profitable only if you love what you do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | ishween kaur | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | MrIshtpreet | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | M.Nazeem Shifnas | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | pushpak | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | nands71191 | 61 | view |
- Your English teacher has found a new penfriend for you Write a letter to the penfriend and introduce yourself Tell them what you like doing in your free time Ask your penfriend to tell you about their hobbies and interest 87
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potential harmful effects they may have on our health and our society Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for the 73
- Is it good to experiment on animals What do you think 67
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Others think that children s time is better spent on academic subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...t education system, we all are learning like a herd of sheep while practically we bo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... of skills and going to be used by only some of the professions then why bother teaching a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70034843206 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53835562534 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.0450747733 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3125 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158649582272 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502324866955 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741220889303 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114644444369 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119360011159 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.