some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
to what extent do you agree with this view?
There is a standpoint of people that financial contribution on arts is useless, instead, it should be spent on something else. I personally think this tendency is not as efficient as paying attention to craft, since art helps to flourish our skills.
The first reason of my disagreement is the importance of art in our personal prosperity and development of society. It is obvious that craft plays crucial role in ameliorating our imaginations and physical activeness as they depend on one another. For instance, the one who is engaged in art is more creative, analyzing and understanding besides he has rambling life-style since in the process of constructing or creating something he must be dynamic. Moreover, the more artists in the area the more creative developments there. Designers are those who are able to make the place attractive by creating unique constructions, skyscrapers or old-fashioned buildings and promote the level of visiting there as a popular touristic zone. For example, NY is known as concrete jungle with its multistory buildings and Rome with old-spirited constructions are one of the most-visited places of the world. Furthermore, musicians who are able to make their homelands well-known even there is no facilities to make them popular.
Secondly, crafting is one of the lovely activities among people and can be one of useful pastimes because, whenever people create something or busy with their lovely business, they feel much better and it can lead them to the pleasure life. As a statistics, those who owned art as their first job are much successful and pleased with their life.
To draw a conclusion, I would pen down saying that contributing on art can be one of the beneficial expenditure not only for government but also for individuals.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasions where relevant 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 56
- in some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The table shows Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 100
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparasion where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 974, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no facilities'?
Suggestion: there are no facilities
...to make their homelands well-known even there is no facilities to make them popular. Secondly, craft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14089347079 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09689303148 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9510609236 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134106179993 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047851568038 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044178459547 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960046966326 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520332613938 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.