Topic: Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Regional culture contributes to shaping the amour proper and history of many countries and nationalities. Hence, protecting culture is the vital citizens mission. In fact, some people believe that visitors should be forbidden in few zones, conversely, others insist this method is unavoidable and pointless. In the next paragraphs, I will consult points from both views. Personally, I am likely to agree with the latter.
On the one hand, the intrusion of outsiders may disturb local traditions and create unrest among the people. There is no denial that native resident completely can imitate the lifestyle and behaviour like a foreigner through the demonstration result, which has adverse effects on the loss of traditional cultures. Furthermore, tourism could have detrimental impact on evironment, specifically, infrastructure provokes natural habitants and spoils the landscapes. Thus, individuals feel that blocking such areas to travellers is the easiest way to conserve local cultures.
On the other hand, people believe that shut local cultures off from visitors is by no means dispensable. In some circumstances, tourism industry is crucial for prompting local budget. Its economic benefits depend on attracting investment from government and companies, creating employment due to demand for goods or services. Besides, the world turn into multicultural, intercultural and global harmony as the consequences of cultural exchange between continents. To put it frankly, fallout of banning tourism are worse than any cultural loss that may occur from the arrival of travellers.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the merits of gaping regional culture are more notable than its drawbacks. Travel likewise aids us broaden our minds and horizons. To buffer local cultures against disappearance, the government should dawn laws, together with taxpayers, own appropriate and comprehensive measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nhanluu79462 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | bikram12 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | DQDang | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | satyam mangroliya | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
... Hence, protecting culture is the vital citizens mission. In fact, some people believe t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, frankly, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, may, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72887323944 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1017649403 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68661971831 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5262954492 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7058823529 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261393033674 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645700489013 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559974128686 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129526314918 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619306711047 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.