Topic 07/06/19: More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that obesity has become a common bodily condition, especially in children. Thus, raising the cost of fattening products is recommended as a measure to tackle this problem. This solution has its merits; however, I believe other actions should also be taken.
On the one hand, products containing high levels of sugar, gluten and lipid have been preferable by consumers because they are easy to prepare and cheap to purchase. For instance, the supermarkets in the UK are filled with high-calories frozen oven fish and chips at an unimaginable low price. Nevertheless, the increasing price of high-fat foods will probably discourage customers, especially those in a lower-income bracket. Alternatively, buyers will have to opt for fresh ingredients to cook at home, which is likely to reduce rate of obesity.
On the other hand, individuals who are preoccupied with work and incapable of cooking will not be too affected by the high price; thus, this requires other solutions. Firstly, the government and institutions devoting to health should launch campaigns to raise people’s awareness about a nutritious diet and the severe consequences of being overweight. Besides, it is the supermarkets’ and retailers’ responsibilities when it comes to the promotion of low-carb, low-sugar foods by deals and discounts to change consumers’ harmful eating habits. Finally, it is suggested that if schools offer health and nutrition subjects and their cafeterias only serve healthy foods, their students will greatly benefit. For example, children can be taught cooking lessons and the nutritional values of different foods so as they can select what to incorporate into their diet.
To conclude, although increasing the cost of fattening foods can be an effective way to address obesity, other measures on the base of consumerism and education are needed to uproot the problem.
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 11 5 19 Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 84
- Topic 22 6 19 Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic 25 04 19 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Topic 13 4 19 In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvan 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eve other actions should also be taken. On the one hand, products containing hig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42372881356 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08226012726 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3339320887 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143599267856 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046061662376 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389762575299 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842759976888 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298022667139 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.