Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
In a modern consumer society, the social phenomenon of prominent athletes who make a great deal of money via the presentation for a sports brand. Although this trend reaps an array of beneficial impacts on sports players, there are several downsides need taking into consideration.
On the one hand, it is undeniable to claim that the enormous assets of being representatives of a renowned sports player. First and foremost, being able to revenue the income of these brands is evident by availing the prestige of well-known sportsmen. The reasons for that is consumers have a tendency to squander their fortune to purchase the products of sport-players by virtue of giving their admiration to their eminent athletes. For example, Nike is one of the most ubiquitous sports brands around the world, by taking Ronaldo for the endorsement of their goods, Nike is able to lucrative from this project and gets the new high of their success. In other words, this trend could be a perfect foundation for prominent athletes to earn a fortune by various types of endorsement contracts. For these reasons, it is when their success in previous contracts which draws audiences to pay regards in their products and also makes a contribution to enhancing their reputation to get more well-paid contracts. Thus, their profits would be lifted up to make different needs in their life.
On the contrary, despite these advantages, the downsides of this trend always exist for these celebrities. The first reason is to influence of celebrities’ reputation if the products of their brand get the unacceptable quality. In fact, in this case, this problem not only exerts detrimental impacts on their brand, but also these celebrities such as bearing the burnt of numerous crisis from the buyer. Consequently, a number of consumers tend to get frustrated through this problem or even throw these celebrities’ career path in disarray. Another fact is the work of these celebrities could be gotten sidetracked by the endorsement of sporting goods. To be more specific, lucrative profits can be fiercely intriguing to them and provoke them to go the extra mile in finding more contracts which spurs their inevitable problem of being prone to prioritize this work and leading to their career to be ruined.
For the advantages and disadvantages mentioned above, while this phenomenon brings a lot of drawbacks, the benefits are far from being impractical.
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 84
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What causes and what are the problems 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 61
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Do you agree disagree with this view 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... of being representatives of a renowned sports player. First and foremost, being able ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17929292929 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92839915832 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.993358885 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1875 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167517592424 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642734877556 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454630859346 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116114175922 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161779680573 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.