some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individuals to protect themselves. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the past few years, the prevailing problem of mitigating the rate of crime has drawn public attention. People have different views about whether giving a longer time for the prisoner or carrying out alternative solutions has marked positive influence. This essay will shed light on both viewpoints and give my own opinion.
On one side of the argument, there are a few rationales to explain why many hold a belief that the expansion of time for trespassers exerting disastrous corollaries in various aspects of our lives. The first reason is to pose a multitude of crippling pressures to the governments. In fact, when offenders conduct the law for long periods of time spurring the dire consequence which the governments are able to have rooms for offenders’ improvements in terms of foods, infrastructures and the like. Consequently, this takes its toll on governments’ allocation when the budget is gradually stretched thin from time to time. Another fact is that being a shortage of accommodations for criminal offences could result in the number of detrimental repercussions. Thus, if offenders must be taken a long time in jails or not even to mention life sentences, which in turns not only leading to an inevitable problem of overwhelmed prison but also being likely to subject to the national budget by constructing numerous prisons.
As far as something is concerned, I would partially comply that opting other efficient measures due to the lowered rate of crime, which reaps an array of beneficial ramifications. First and foremost, governments should avail their jurisdiction to generate some meetings for citizens to raise their perceptions when it comes to disastrous repercussions derived from these criminal activities. The end results are not only to conceive the adverse effect of turning on crime but also put an end to this onerous problem. In other words, it is of paramount importance that the regulation regarding crime needs triggering far-reaching changes by the authorities. They are likely to enforce stern laws which act as a deterrence, advocating to pose a multitude of threats to offenders with harsh punishments. As a result, the number of offenders could be minimized, creating a safer community.
In conclusion, as cited above, the measure of increasing enforcement could be impractical, and thus the aforementioned solutions have a higher possibility to bring a plethora of advantages.
- the chart below gives information about car ownership in uk from 1975 to 2005 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 87
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ere are a few rationales to explain why many hold a belief that the expansion of time for...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3118556701 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16787177361 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605670103093 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5532096427 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8125 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153573125706 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045054840164 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309957705688 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863990822565 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426833723216 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.