It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is assumed that this is the contradictory association between mainstream societies and technical development. They think that as the technology evolves, certain conventional societies are destroyed. I fully agree with the statement, from my perspective, that conventional societies and the advancement of technology are inconsistent ties.
The computer system is more new, people have been using their system things more often. Therefore people prefer to waste their time on other enjoyable things like playing games or watching movies. And they don't want to experience the traditional activities like they did in the past. Taking Vietnam as an example, in 2000, citizens went home on Tet vacations to meet with their extended family and relatives. Today, though, citizens fly with their parental family to other countries after having had a long period of time to operate.
The taking place of some traditional culture is a good time to be in close contact with others and to be connected. Nevertheless, people allow the difference between their friendship, thanks to the advancement in information technology. People have started using their phone lately to communicate or messaging someone over the Internet instead of heading out and communicating or meeting them face to face effectively. For starters, Facebook and Messenger, which are Facebook company-developed applications, are common youth-generation media apps. Furthermore, these devices are a good way to preserve the partnership without heading outside. Therefore, pressing their phone is the only move they need to take. Therefore, not only technological advancement would be wasted owing to technological progression, but technology creation can affect detrimental impacts on lives and bodies of humans.
To sum up, the contradictory partnership is conventional traditions, and technological development. Therefore, because of the importance of regional activities, citizens ought to behave to hold their typical affairs in their nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 67
- After graduation many students take a year to travel Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some educational systems make students study specialised subjects from the age of fifteen while others require students to study a wide range Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n using their system things more often. Therefore people prefer to waste their time on ot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ying games or watching movies. And they dont want to experience the traditional acti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...other countries after having had a long period of time to operate. The taking place of some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7525083612 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27558125478 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2780654216 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.176470588 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159603408635 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476309048779 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616342475528 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887212081817 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490286796953 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.