some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individuals to protect themselves. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the past few years, the prevailing problem of mitigating the rate of crime has drawn public attention. People have different views about whether giving longer prison or carrying out another alternative solution has marked positive influence. I will shed lights on both viewpoints and give my own opinion.
On one side of an argument, there are a few rationales to explain why many hold a belief that the acceleration of time for prison sentences which exerts disastrous corollaries in many aspects of our lives. The first reason is to enhance the crippling pressures on the governments. In fact, it is when offenders enforce the law for long periods of time spurring the dire consequence which the governments are able to have rooms for offenders’ improvement in terms of foods, infrastructures and the like. Consequently, this takes its toll on the governments’ allocation when the budget is gradually stretched thin from time to time. Another fact is that being a shortage of accommodations for criminal offences could result in the number of detrimental repercussions. Thus, if offences must be taken a long time in jails or not even to mention life sentences, which in turns not only leading to an inevitable problem of being overwhelmed habits but also being likely to subject to the national budget by constructing numerous prisons.
As far as something is concerned, I would partially comply that opting other efficient measures due to the lowered rate of crime, which reaps an array of beneficial ramifications. First and Foremost, governments should avail their jurisdiction to generate some meetings for citizens to raise the public’s perception when it comes to disastrous repercussions derived from criminal activities. The end results are not only to conceive the adverse effect of turning on crime but also put an end to this onerous problem. In other words, it is of paramount importance that the regulation regarding crime needs triggering far-reaching changes by the authorities. They are likely to enforce stern laws which act as a deterrence, advocating to pose a multitude of threats to offenders with harsh punishments. As a result, the number of offenders could be minimized, creating a safer community.
In conclusion, as cited above, the measure of the expanding enforcement seems unproductive and futile, and thus implementing the aforementioned solutions bring a plethora of advantages.
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Do you agree disagree with this view 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news program 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ere are a few rationales to explain why many hold a belief that the acceleration of time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31865284974 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15589662084 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608808290155 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4839151804 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151089865007 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043953980017 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323503564115 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782980422923 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479725525605 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ere are a few rationales to explain why many hold a belief that the acceleration of time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31865284974 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15589662084 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608808290155 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4839151804 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151089865007 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043953980017 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323503564115 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782980422923 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479725525605 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.