When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are comments that a building's function is more important than its exterior in the design stage. In my opinion, although an attractive appearance is beneficial sometimes, I agree with the idea that a construction's purpose should be more highly valued.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that a magnificent looking structure can bring a wide range of benefits. Firstly, it can enhance significantly the value of a building, especially a commercial or shopping center, since it looks more attractive, professional and high class. As a result, the more customers are attracted to the building, the more profit is generated, which can benefit the building's owners enormously. Secondly, buildings with an aesthetic design can contribute to the appearance of a city, and may make it become one of the most distinguishing places on the map. For example, a lot of cities, such as Istanbul and Amsterdam, where are well-known for their architectural beauty have become popular destinations for tourists.
On the other hand, the purpose of a building, in my view, is the key consideration when designing it. Each building has its own practical use, such as schools, hospitals and office buildings, so architects have to design it with a view to satisfying the requirement of the building's users. For example, a shopping mall has to possess a wide walkway, a good lighting system and adequate emergency exits. In addition, people use a particular place because of what it offers inside, not merely because of what it looks like on the outside. For instance, a cinema is supposed to have a well-designed sound system, a big screen and comfortable seats so that clients using service can conveniently enjoy movies.
In conclusion, although both factors are important, I think that the construction of building without a proper function-bases design, the gorgeous appearance of a building is only a waste of investment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Afdalah Harris | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-14 | camille1104 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
- he maps below show information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 69
- Most of the world s problems are caused by overpopulation Do you agree or disagree 89
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16346153846 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14098475902 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5984420259 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4615384615 7.06120827912 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254987259822 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877320125123 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083056907686 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162402973689 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491383166516 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.