Ecotourism is defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment. What are the advantages and disavantages of ecotourism? How can we make it more popular?
In the contemporary society, ecotourism has become one of the fastest growing sectors of the tourism industry. It is considered a way in charge of travelling to natural regions that conserve the environment. There are numerous concerns about ecotourism, and below is a discussion about the pros and cons of it, accompanied with methods to gain the popularity for ecotourism.
On the bright side, ecotourism is advantageous in many ways. First and foremost, it goes without saying that ecotourism assists in reinforcing the financial foundation of the local residents. Not only did it raise the incomes of them, but it also works out the unemployment issues. As an illustration, increasing travel to local attractions contributes to more occupations such as tour guides for those who are jobless. Another beneficial point is the knowledge ecotourism brings. Tourists have chances to cultivate their mind with a mass of valuable biological information including fauna, flora or even geological one. Moreover, when they gain a deep understanding of the surroundings, the spreading awareness of protecting the environment begins to take shape in their mind. On the dark side, to several extents, we should not turn a blind eye to the fact that tourists whe travel on an eco-tour may cause threats to ecosystems. Even though ecotourism is defined as a way to conserve environment, this purpose may be counter-productive. The increasing number of tourists day by day can become the main reason resulting in the wildlife degradation. Many of them explore the ecosystem in several ways without taking notice of whether these may do harm or not.
Meanwhile, a set of measures had better be taken so as to disseminate this sector of tourism industry. To begin with, advertising online seems to be a good idea. Through it, people can get a solid grasp of the meaning of ecotourism, as well as be attracted by this type of travelling. What is more, it is essential that campaigns be raised with an aim to ecouraging people to conserve wildlife by ecotourism. Advocating ecotourism in this way might bring about fruitful outcomes.
All things considered, the merits of ecotourism outweight the demerits. In my own view, it is vitally chief for us to promote this sector of tourism. Only by doing that, we just have great contribution to the eco-being of environment.
- Modern technology has increased our material wealth but not our happiness 72
- The line chart shows the rate of oil consumption in a small country from 1950 to 2010 The table shows the number of people employed in the oil industry of that country and the rate of unemployment around the country at the same time 84
- The tables below show the average speed of urban zone traffic in kilometers per hour or kph in a number of countries over 60 years including a future estimate and also the total number of urban zones per country in thousands Describe the information by se 80
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out at work What could be the reason for this Do you think it is positive or negative development 84
- Ecotourism is defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages and disavantages of ecotourism How can we make it more popular 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
..., a set of measures had better be taken so as to disseminate this sector of tourism indu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, such as, as well as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10621761658 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11266276594 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8437883975 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209667257998 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560605845415 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499013995157 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111703354301 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387366986944 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.