Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful.
Do you agree or disagree?
The question regarding the gender role in governing countries has been extremely debatable in all society. It is argued that men rulers have always exercised violent and conflicting way of leading the country, therefore females are considered to be more peaceful leaders. I strongly disagree with this statement and believe that males are predisposed to become better sources of power than females.
First of all, men are regarded as inborn leaders. This is because males possess crucial qualities that make them surpass their female counterparts. Moreover, on the genetic level men have demonstrated leadership properties due to the fact that they have more hormones of strength and power such as testosterone and androgen. For example, according to Moscow State University men outraced women in most of tests and experiments concerning physical dominance and ability to make decisions. Thus, males explicitly surpass females in the capability to rule and govern the nations.
Secondly, the nature of women does not allow them to undertake paramount decisions. This means that their bodies produce abundant amount of estrogen hormones, which hinder them to concentrate and become genuine leaders. Therefore, some of the crucial positions in the society do not fit females owing to their gender peculiarities. For instance, a recent study conducted by Moscow Medical Research Centre concluded that women are fitter for the family rather than some conflicting social positions such as in politics. In other words, women ought to occupy roles that do not require any stress.
In conclusion, I think that women are not suitable to rule countries since they are more emotional and less susceptible to demonstrate leadership.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 84
- Today the internet has created that chance for ordinary people to become famous Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the tests') or simply say ''most tests''.
Suggestion: most of the tests; most tests
... State University men outraced women in most of tests and experiments concerning physical dom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... and become genuine leaders. Therefore, some of the crucial positions in the society do not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46268656716 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78646163731 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9578859934 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15629934043 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498469204437 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493327554067 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888596540718 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516218568225 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.