More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating
There is no doubt that nowadays technology has essential function in every aspects of human life including the ways of communication. Moreover, technology has been quite helpful for people who has arduous task become easier. Although it has encouraged enhancement of information transmission in terms of speed and opportunities, it has also threatened existence of face to face social life interaction. This essay will discuss the positive and negative sides of technology for communicating.
Looking firstly at the advantages, technology has engendered unprecedented development in communication sector. The obvious benefits is that owning to the blessing of technology, people can communicate with their beloved people easily and instantly. In other hand, people can have direct and live interaction with others even if anyone lives in the farthest corner of the planet. For instance, prevalence of video chatting provided space for people to share not only their audio but also moments at the same time beside of geographical boundaries. Clearly, face to face communication requires someone to be physically present at the time for conversation, which is often not possible to people who live overseas.
Nevertheless, technology is not exempt from drawbacks. Firstly, human become more and more obsessed of communication based on technology because its convenience. Thus, every single day of life has being supplanted by the virtual communication. Moreover, people is going to be more susceptible of cyber-crime. Cyber offenders claim can gain people confidential data and use it as blackmail. Also, they can use it to defamation. The worst effect being obsessed through technology is it eventually make people engendered loneliness and then stress because of the virtual confabulation cannot replace the joy of realistic interaction.
In conclusion, while technology has bestowed communication more easily and infinite, it also has lessened real interaction among people and vulnerable of cyber-crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-23 | lakhveer khokhar | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-12 | Bonita Melinda Pangaribuan | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-05 | oyondev007 | 93 | view |
| 2020-05-06 | lamtrann | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | gagan00152 | 87 | view |
- Men and women can never share the same responsibilities at home and in everyday life Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 56
- The number of visitors to two different tourist attractions in the city of Grenby during a particular week 87
- Many stores sell organic fruits and vegetables produced without the use of chemical fertilizers pesticides and herbicides even though the often cost more than conventional fruits and vegetables Why do some people prefer to eat organic food Do you think or 56
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefit that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both view and give your opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68106312292 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25753226065 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4229092711 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.588235294 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297759466157 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925288609703 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567578795419 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174985711461 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334582496773 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.