The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
As we can see, the line graph illustrates the proportion of people working in three economic sectors in the United Kingdom, over a decade between 2000 and 2010.
Generally speaking, public sector jobs employment rate is considered the highest, and people showed the least concern in self-employed jobs in the year 2000. In addition to this clear point, we can witness that in the year 2010, public sector jobs rose up to highest number; however, private sector employment rate descend at the bottom during the same year.
Between the years 2000 to 2005, public sector started at nearly 40% in 2000, and remained constant throughout first three years. It started rising in 2002 reaching 50% in the year 2005. When looking at self-employment, it fluctuates between 18% and 20% throughout the years, ending with 20% in 2005. Private sector starts with approximate 48%, it then starts descending just above 40% in 2002, and afterwards it remained constant the next year. In year 2003, it again shows step decline reaching just above 30% in the year 2005.
Future predictions indicate that during the year 2005 to 2010, public sector starts with just below 50% and shows a decrement of 5%, and finally rises up to just above 50% at the end of the year 2010. When talking about private sector, over the span of five years, between 2005 to 2010, it started declining reaching 20% in the year 2010. Finally, just like public sector self-employment, jumped to 30% in the year 2009, and remained constant the final year.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-10 | Andino0226 | 87 | view |
2021-10-10 | Andino0226 | 84 | view |
2021-10-10 | Andino0226 | 73 | view |
2021-09-18 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
2021-02-09 | Muhiddinov Nodirbek | 68 | view |
- Some people say that science study should be mandatory in schools others argue that it is unnecessary Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Goods transported in UK 73
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...e year 2010, public sector jobs rose up to highest number; however, private sector employm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d at the bottom during the same year. Between the years 2000 to 2005, public s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, then, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91828793774 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49005957262 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482490272374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9576724925 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21297740443 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969414715617 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830519731098 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162580322352 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687221061894 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.