Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems such as deforestation, global warming and climate change are becoming increasingly common and attract more and more public attention. However, there are some irresponsible people who argue that responsibility to protecting the environment should fall on politicians not individuals due to the fact that individuals can do too little. I absolutely disagree with these people.
It is undeniable that politicians play an important role in environmental protection. First, to tackle these problems, for example, to slow down global warming, it is critical to reduce the number of traffic on the road and people’s reliance on fuel. To do this, policies which enable the development of renewable energy resource and the improvement of public transport services should be adopted. It is politicians who suggest and enforce these policies. In addition, by using their influence, they could, for instance, encourage people to consume environmentally friendly products instead of those with a lot of packaging or give speeches at schools and other educational institutes to teach the younger generations the importance of environmental preservation and how to coexist with other animals and plants.
However, it is flawed to use the reasons mentioned above to underestimate the effect of ordinary people on protecting the environment. They have a range of ways to contribute to this process. By refusing to buy commodities manufactured by bad environmental practices or exerting pressure on government to ban these practices, the public can put companies which maximizing their revenue by exploiting the environment out of business. They can also support for enterprises whose products are biodegradable. Without public involvement, it is hard for these businesses to out-compete the bad ones.
In conclusion, the politicians’ role in protecting the environment is undoubtful and normal people can greatly affect environmental safeguard by carefully choosing which products to buy.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70234113712 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36693134235 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.5999951177 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218911375723 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682482077549 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887025688102 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142434156687 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909377804185 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.