Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There are those who maintain that it is unjustified to invest in technology for space exploration as that money should be spent in more beneficial ways. From my perspective, allocating money to other sectors is important, but expenditure on space should not be neglected.
To begin with, it is justifiable that money needs to be channeled into different aspects to enhance people’s living standards. For example, education and medicine are the two top priorities for most of the governments all over the globe. The reason is that a healthy, educated population can perform significantly well in their study or work, which in turn spurs economic growth. It should also be noted that an informed individual, with a stable job and regular income, is less likely to engage in criminal acts. Accordingly, the investment in these two sectors is smarter in the long run. What is more, if money is spent on other areas such as transportation, social security or welfare, the citizens’ quality of lives would be substantially improved, resulting in higher trust in the authorities.
The spending on technology to facilitate space exploration should however be given equal importance. There is no denying that the natural resources on Earth are increasingly depleted, together with population explosion. This means that our planet could no longer be sustained, thereby failing to accommodate the future generations. For this reason, space researches play a pivotal role in providing the descendants a potential backup. In other words, terrestrial beings might be able to reside in other planets such as Mars due to the proven close resemblance to the Earth. Another justification is that space exploration is a huge project, requiring the contributions of thousands of people. The allocation of budget to such research can not only generate employment but can also inspire participants to make new inventions for dealing with existing global problems.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, equal emphasis should be placed on both space projects and other sectors. This could therefore warrant a more fulfilling life for the Earthlings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Researches into new types of medicine and treatments are essential to improve health and deal with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or the government 60
- Sport is big business and high earning cost for professional sport people A lot of companies involved both financially and in other ways Is negative or positive for development sport 89
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyze the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 89
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealt 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30973451327 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03822493092 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5448851615 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.882352941 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221321495497 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714190060218 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743186988295 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147767182668 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595599639782 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.