Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses, nevertheless they are just as disabling in their own way. Society, however, is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Public concern has arisen about whether we are ignoring terrible effects that psychological illnesses have on patients or not. From my perspective, I totally agree that social prejudice on these illnesses is still severe and most people do not consider them as a health problem.
The causes of this situation are manifold. The fundamental factor that we need to take into consideration is that unlike physical disabilities, symptoms of mental disorders are invisible and varied from one to another. Take depression as an example. Whereas some patients suffering from this illness become sensitive and vulnerable, others may seem no different from a healthy person. As a result, their problems are unpredictable and cannot be diagnosed by any medical equipments.
In the second place, compared to physical diseases with thousands of years of researching, mental illnesses are considered problems of modern society and consequences of an excessively comfortable life. Although this belief is completely wrong, it is quite common among people who are lack of knowledge on medical area. Therefore, mental patients are often neglected by most of the social members owing to the underrated evaluations of their illnesses.
On top of that, there are now no precise cure for these problems and most of the treatments by psychological experts depend on personal experience and general theories which are not suitable for all circumstances. For instance, although two patients suffer from the same illness, their symptoms and methods of treatment are not similar. As a consequence, in most cases, the treatment process seems unreliable and depends on luck.
All things considered, psychological illnesses are not widely recognised as dead diseases and encounter objects from people on treatment process. Accordingly, it is generally advisable to improve the awareness of publicity on these mental disorders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | ieS | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-18 | doanthao2082003 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 92 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | cecilia | 88 | view |
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment Discuss some of the arguments for and or against keeping animals in zoos Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 84
- In the past museums stored information about culture and history However nowadays this information can be found through the Internet so there is no need for museums Do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... wrong, it is quite common among people who are lack of knowledge on medical area. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, for instance, as a result, in most cases, in the second place, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53767123288 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04695805162 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8824440196 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1491889349 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043843681519 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449189431398 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837279432077 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291791524669 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.