Modern technology has increased our material wealth, but not our happiness
In modern context, the cutting edge technology is creeping into every aspect of life. Many people regard it as the evaluation of status and wealth, but not the measurement of happiness levels. From my perspective, I assert that modern technology has made great contribution to affluence and joyfulness.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there is an increase in material wealth due to developing technology. To begin with, it strongly fosters economic prosperity in various countries. By applying the most sophisticated technological advancement into manufacture, these nations can publicize high-quality products which stimulate excessive comsumption. To illustrate, the thriving of many Western countries mainly depends on their success in the domain of technology. In addition, the advent of technology caters for almost every need of human beings these days. In the light of erecting numerous material facilities such as recreational services or medical care ones, people will have more chances to experience a litterally satisfactory and high-standard life.
On the other hand, apart from the reasons expressed above, I am also partly of the opinion that modern technology increases happiness levels. First and foremost, it advocates more close-knit relationships among human. As digital devices are considered powerful communication facilitators, they enable human to stay in touch with families and friends regardless of geological barriers. Technology acts as a stimulator to built up a happy and concrete relationship. Secondly, the presence of automation in industry leads to a decline in workload. In other words, it is no longer necessary for employees to work overtime completing tasks. Instead, they could spend more time on idividual interests or gathering with their beloved. Technological growth allows human to live a stress-free life and experience a boost in happiness level.
In brief, while it is evident that modern technology creates a properous world, it also should be credited with the mental well-being of human.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | Bigk016 | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the minutes per day spent by different age groups in the United Kingdom on three media 54
- The line chart shows the rate of oil consumption in a small country from 1950 to 2010 The table shows the number of people employed in the oil industry of that country and the rate of unemployment around the country at the same time 84
- The definition of success 61
- The media should include more stories which report good news To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, in brief, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59485530547 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16139477623 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639871382637 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1793026272 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228130474807 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632633267046 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634011468528 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132543605814 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433621328478 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.