Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities. Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "exams are commonly used in most schools and universities; some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessments" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that written assessments might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that other forms of assessment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, replacing exams by other forms of assessment can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that oral presentations and new assessment methods are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of exams on students. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both assignments and open-book exams distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, using exams in most schools might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of students' anxiety during exam weeks. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the self-esteem of students can relate to the reality that the demerits of final exams can pertain to traditional assessment methods. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of written tests were correlated positively with other forms of assessments, the local authorities would ultimately address mental problems of students. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of promoting self-confidence of children.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of using other forms of assessments far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-20 | vahidmetall | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | sattar_iust | 74 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which my be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- As most people spend major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers give reasons for 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries What is your opinion 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79238754325 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31091425907 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1893809405 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.181818182 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423378035553 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137747500749 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121079706401 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231320862507 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109588932332 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79238754325 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31091425907 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1893809405 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.181818182 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423378035553 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137747500749 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121079706401 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231320862507 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109588932332 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.