Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this competitive world, where the job market has become so challenging, getting a job with a good salary needs a lot of knowledge, experience, and confidence. It is often believed that interviewing employees' efficiency and intellectual abilities justify the position offered by a company. However, this idea varies largely as few masses oppose it in the favor of other efficient ways to appoint an employee. This essay will emphasize various points on both aspects before reaching to a desirable opinion.
It is commonly known that a recruitment process usually follows filtration criteria followed by a series of designed queries either based on technical or social skills. The one who fulfills the job requirements with years of expertise, popular certifications, and a positive body language gobbles up the opportunity. For instance, it is often suggested that a proper dressing sense, effective communication skills, and confidence play a crucial role in achieving the target.
On the contrary, a section of society argues with the traditional method of evaluating a person's caliber. As it takes a number of years to master a skill in a particular stream, but testing or rejection takes hardly a few minutes which is completely injustice to one's talent. For example, underperforming on a particular question due to the stress of facing a huge panel of judges leaves them in an awful situation, despite being a rank holder or a hard-working. individual. So, while planning an interview, it is much appreciable to judge candidates' passion for the role including his contributions to the company's future growth plan. It sounds much sensible to test a candidate's intelligence in a limited subject area under a stress-free environment.
To conclude, although companies prefer testing in an interview as the best tool for the judging criteria, in my personal opinion, a persons' ability should not be restricted to a minute hand of a clock instead a hands-on practical approach on a prior communicated project can help candidates to showcase their talent in the best possible way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-16 | Shwatank | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | pris | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | sahilrocks11 | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | Anmol Thukral | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | Anmol Thukral | 48 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
- 49
- The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... the traditional method of evaluating a persons caliber. As it takes a number of years ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...inutes which is completely injustice to ones talent. For example, underperforming on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tuation, despite being a rank holder or a hard-working. individual. So, while planning an int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individual
...being a rank holder or a hard-working. individual. So, while planning an interview, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 672, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...plan. It sounds much sensible to test a candidates intelligence in a limited subject area ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...st tool for the judging criteria, in my personal opinion, a persons ability should not be restri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ing criteria, in my personal opinion, a persons ability should not be restricted to a m...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...talent in the best possible way.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28143712575 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17154488811 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1522956684 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.692307692 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151819938132 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456889552352 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391732216874 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861515603651 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458037517997 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.