Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is undoubtedly true that museums and other areas that have historical values had been established as tourist attractions for quite a long time. Nevertheless, the majority of visitors paying a visit to these places are overseas as local people had a nonchalant attitude toward them. From my perspective, this worrisome tendency results from several causes and actions should be taken to tackle it
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for the shortage of local visitors paying a visit to historical sites. One outstanding justification is the misinterpretation of the local people. There seems to be evidence that the majority of indigenous citizens often deem that they understand their birthplace by heart, thereby, considering exhibitive place including museums as monotonous and dogma as these institutions have hardly anything to learn from. Another reason which is worth considering is the financial issue. Although there are certain arguments that the entrance ticket fee to access to museums is nothing too pricy when compared with the advantageous impact of it, most domestic visitors maintain the view that entering these galleries is only a waste of money and, therefore, refuse to have a go at these sites
Although there is no easy answer for the pre-mentioned hassle, there is some measure that can be taken to gradually improve the circumstance. One simple but effective solution is to raise awareness about the interesting points of museums and historical heritage among the population. Transforming these sites into a cinematic stage can be a suitable case in point. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that a well-made historical film can draw a great deal of attention from local people and encourage them to pay a visit museums or monuments to see the antiques with their naked eyes. Another measure would be to organize tours which are free-of-charge for indigenous citizens, hence, deal with their monetary concerns that hinder people from giving these place a try
In conclusion, the underlying reasons behind the nonchalant attitude towards museums and historical heritage of local people are the misunderstanding and monetary issue. Therefore, more free tours for locals should be established. Furthermore, turning these place into filming location can also be a good means of drawing attention from the domestic population
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | anh thu080903 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | komal25 | 67 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 95
- The migration of people to cities is one of the biggest problems facing the world s cities today Discuss the main causes What solutions can be used to tackle the situation 73
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce goods To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.384 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99816358608 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.754484514 49.4020404114 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.307692308 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36295526481 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121282901033 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064051232569 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227235964245 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364558378889 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.