Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.
To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
While there is no doubt that human civilization mainly relies on fossil fuels these days, various eco-friendly energy sources came into the spotlight as a substitute. Personally, I strongly believe that this trend has various benefits in terms of environmental protection as well as all lives on this planet.
To begin with, it is obvious that human activities of using for oil and gas have many harmful effects on various aspects. First, during the process of searching the oil and gas, thousands of rare species are dying out by losing their natural habitats as people exploiting carelessly to the untouched natural landscapes. To be more specific, they often cut down forests and contaminate the land and water by spilling oil which causes long-lasting damage to the wildlife and their home. Second, using such energy also brings a negative impact on human life. For example, fossil fuel consumed by transports and industries emits a whole host of toxic gas that contaminates the atmosphere. As a result, many people suffer from increased risks of diseases, especially in the respiratory system. I think, therefore, those mentioned drawbacks of fossil fuels are already good enough to develop alternative resources.
On the other hand, alternative energy sources like solar, wind, or perhaps water does not harm both lives and environments at all. Although those substitutes are not efficient as far as fossil fuels, the current speed of technological development would be enough to overcome the issue. On top of that, using such clean energy will bring back to the normal any wild animals in the dangers of extinction and contaminated natural preserves. Another meaning is that we can leave the clean earth for the next generation proudly.
In conclusion, although we are still reliant on fossil fuel to continue our civilization, developing and accepting of new clean energy sources are really necessary for the bright future of human and other creatures living on the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | roadtoapro | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | iamktw90 | 84 | view |
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by fast food This has a negative impact on families individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages 78
- There is a public park near where you live You have heard that the local council wants to sell this park Write a letter to a local newspaper In your letter introduce yourself describe the importance of the park say what action you will take if the council 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.221875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79738822107 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7246195615 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.357142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293294654879 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857232885071 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516285343348 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163003072261 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164469001328 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.