Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Other, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
To become as an individual valued by society, a child should be educated by adults. Some say that they ought to learn more this by their parents, while others suggest that schools play a pivotal role to do so. Are children nurtured efficiently by parents who can entertain them or by schools which have several decades of experience?
Some psychologists suggest that teaching will be effective only if there is involved an entertainment. That is, parents can teach their offspring, and play with them whenever they spend time together outside, especially in recreational areas. This is an efficient method of demonstration of an appropriate behaviour in the public. Another major role of parents can be their intimacy with their child which helps them to find a common activity to play and study. For example, when parents nurture their children by regularly spending a great deal of time and effort in order to solve problems, such as crosswords with pleasure.
On the other hand, schools have years of experience to accomplish this. As children spent the majority of their time there, schools can introduce additional disciplines to teach them on a daily basis. For example, it is often argued that a group teaching is as much effective as individual one, for these schoolboys would develop a strong ideology thanks for having constant interactions with peers and continuously improving their good manners. However, this is not automatically the case.
In conclusion, schools offer certain disciplines, which have been adapted for years, to the upbringing of children; however, with the assistance of parents, they can take advantages of learning and teaching simultaneously. Therefore, to be a good member of society, children should be given an opportunity to have both types of these approaches.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-10-21 | Andi Rifani | 56 | view |
2020-10-18 | brandnewiman | 73 | view |
2020-10-10 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
2020-10-10 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
2020-10-09 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants over a decade between 2003 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss bother these views and give your opinion 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspapers Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government 54
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24827586207 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92928142301 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4168924322 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213141568361 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812844255818 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446939988682 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146984975164 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388688735519 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.