Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this contemporary society, the environmental problem related to massive rate of package has become a pressing issue. In addition, while many people consider that manufacturers are directly responsible for the reduction of excess packaging, the others believe customers should involve to tackle this urgent problem. In my point of view, a combination of both methods is a most effective way to measure this condition.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why the contribution of supermarkets or manufacturers directly reduces the number of packaged products. Firstly, most companies often pack their products for protection from damage during a delivery process. For instance, it is loterria company in HCM city that plastic is used to grab food on a large scale. However, such a frequency in packaged materials can negatively invoke problem to environment, leading to loads of disposable rubbish. Moreover, supermarkets can limit the number of packaged products which are purchased by boosting the price. In addition, the more exorbitant the price is, the fewer items people are willing to pay, directly reducing products covered by plastic.
Moreover, customers should also start avoiding such unnecessary over packaging of products. To begin with, If people encourage each other to ignore packaged items, manufacturers will stop producing these types of products. For instance, the Britishs have recently focused on durable products and avoided the overuse of packaging, directly resulting in a lower rate of disposable garbage. Secondly, customers can also put pressure towards companies and factories. In addition, thanks to the complaints of several buyers, many manufactures and restaurants not only start using less plastic containers but also adopt more recycled paper.
Taking everything into consideration, as supermarkets and customers play equally essential roles in bridging the amount of packaging, I believe that such a joint effort of these two methods is the most productive measurement to reduce this recent problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- 17 The diagram shows how recycled paper is made 78
- The graph gives information about the number of yearly visits from France and North America for holiday and business 78
- Below tables are the use of water by four different countries 71
- The gap between the rich and poor is becoming wider the rich are getting richer the poor even more poorer What problems can the situation cause and suggest solutions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... involve to tackle this urgent problem. In my point of view, a combination of both...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er packaging of products. To begin with, If people encourage each other to ignore...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59485530547 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97931093869 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601286173633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1691143248 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227092167709 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744222415732 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577259487562 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131314419834 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365141245694 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.